Post by realview on Oct 19, 2016 8:51:39 GMT
Tale of the tape:
Helen Flanagan:
Age: 26
Height:5'3
15-14 (14kos)
Vs
Jennifer Metcalfe:
Age:33
Height:5'6
12-11(11kos)
Two bantamweights who are having very successful 2016's are looking for your votes, so let's look at each fighter.
Helen Flanagan takes the red corner this week, she comes into the ring with 15 wins, 14 losses and 14 kos.
For a fighter aged 26, she has experience that fighters hittinf forty would love to have.
Even though she is undersized some would say for bantamweight boxing, she has shown she has the power to blast out bigger girls and she has the added bonus of being quick on her toes.
Her weakness as stated is height, against the more natural builds for this weight, she lacks the height to be able to retreat and not get hit, which is why she is always in exciting fights, due to her always go forward attitude.
In the blue corner is Jennifer Metcalfe, she has a record of 12 wins, 11 losses and 11 knock outs.
She has silky smooth boxing skills as she is a Lookout! Atlantic girl, so she has the ability but she can also get stuck in when called upon to get up close and personal with an opponent.
Her strengths are she has the build for this division and has even fought at lightweight before in her career, but she is a true bantamweight.
She has dynamite in her own hands as well with just one fight going the distance in her career.
But she is a slow starter, never seeming to get into gear for the first two to three rounds, leaving her in danger of being caught cold early in a fight.
To add extra spice, remember Helen is famous for being Rosie Webster on Coronation Street, while Jennifer is famous for playing Mercades McQueen on Hollyoaks, meaning this is technically a proxy fight between those shows.
So which girl gets your vote?
Helen Flanagan:

Vs
Jennifer Metcalfe:

Vote by clicking on the link below and voting who you believe would win:
vote.pollcode.com/68995551
Helen Flanagan:
Age: 26
Height:5'3
15-14 (14kos)
Vs
Jennifer Metcalfe:
Age:33
Height:5'6
12-11(11kos)
Two bantamweights who are having very successful 2016's are looking for your votes, so let's look at each fighter.
Helen Flanagan takes the red corner this week, she comes into the ring with 15 wins, 14 losses and 14 kos.
For a fighter aged 26, she has experience that fighters hittinf forty would love to have.
Even though she is undersized some would say for bantamweight boxing, she has shown she has the power to blast out bigger girls and she has the added bonus of being quick on her toes.
Her weakness as stated is height, against the more natural builds for this weight, she lacks the height to be able to retreat and not get hit, which is why she is always in exciting fights, due to her always go forward attitude.
In the blue corner is Jennifer Metcalfe, she has a record of 12 wins, 11 losses and 11 knock outs.
She has silky smooth boxing skills as she is a Lookout! Atlantic girl, so she has the ability but she can also get stuck in when called upon to get up close and personal with an opponent.
Her strengths are she has the build for this division and has even fought at lightweight before in her career, but she is a true bantamweight.
She has dynamite in her own hands as well with just one fight going the distance in her career.
But she is a slow starter, never seeming to get into gear for the first two to three rounds, leaving her in danger of being caught cold early in a fight.
To add extra spice, remember Helen is famous for being Rosie Webster on Coronation Street, while Jennifer is famous for playing Mercades McQueen on Hollyoaks, meaning this is technically a proxy fight between those shows.
So which girl gets your vote?
Helen Flanagan:

Vs
Jennifer Metcalfe:

Vote by clicking on the link below and voting who you believe would win:
vote.pollcode.com/68995551